Yea Yea.. My last night's nightmare of painful gastric has totally lost with the rumours of the announced Canon 5D MarkII (shouldn't be rumours anymore)... This babe is what I've been waiting all the while. hahaha, FYI last night i really had a hard time with my tummy, ate about 8 pills of gastric reliever but no effect (well at least it does a bit!). Sleep at 11pm and awake at 3.10am... what a disaster.. then drive to school at 6.20am (find out my tyres are flat), drove 36km for 30minutes (usually 25minutes) and with lazy eyes do my work... argh... OOPS,wasn't i supposed to share with you about the Canon 5D M3? sorry... (just to share)
Speaking about High ISO, well i don't think it can match D700 and D3 at all. I have strong faith in Nikon's noise control. But in terms of Color reproduction, i can say Canon's 1Ds MkIII is good. the late 5D has really given excellent result in landscape, so i believe 5D MkIII promises the same.
yet when i get through the spec at Canon 5D mk III, i found out that it only burst an amount of 3.9 (approximately 4) burst per second. I think its due to the large resolution processing of 21MP that makes it slow. But clockwise, i was made known (by attending the yesterdays Canon's seminar) that it can burst more than 6bps when shooting with a 10mp resolution. Well whatever it is, i think Canon has something good here.
So my decision now? well, i love Nikon's D700 and D3 as it has excellent Noise control which is VERY-VERY good for event shoots and critical low light shooting. But if i'm planning for nature and landscape, i think Canon has much better option. I strongly believe (IMHO) that Nikon now is good at photojournalism and Canon is good at landscape, nature and portrait... (at least at the DLSR option)...
So for now, i haven't really decided yet since my budget is still low, but i think i will get either one of it by November... So stay tuned...
Ref:
kenrockwell review on Canon 5D MkII
Dpreview on Canon 5D MkII
0 comments:
Post a Comment